MTH+Chp10

=**MTH Chp10: Hunger and Thirst for Justice **=
 * [[image:MTH1.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp1"]] || [[image:MTH2.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp2"]] || [[image:MTH3.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp3"]] || [[image:MTH4.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp4"]] || [[image:MTH5.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp5"]] || [[image:MTH6.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp6"]] || [[image:MTH7.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp7"]] || [[image:MTH8.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp8"]] || [[image:MTH9.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp9"]] || [[image:MTH10.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/MTH Chp10"]] ||
 * [[image:SAC1.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp1"]] || [[image:SAC2.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp2"]] || [[image:SAC3.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp3"]] || [[image:SAC4.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp4"]] || [[image:SAC5.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp5"]] || [[image:SAC6.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp6"]] || [[image:SAC7.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp7"]] || [[image:SAC8.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/SAC Chp8"]] || [[image:DEF.png link="bshs-jr-religion-frmccabe/Definitions"]] || [[image:Quizlet.png link="https://quizlet.com/class/3085012/"]] ||
 * See Quizlet for: **
 * ---MTH Chp10 Case Studies: JWT **
 * ---MTH Definitions Chp1 to Chp10 **

=In case I have no speaking voice tomorrow (Tuesday, 05.09.2017),= =I am posting what Winston Churchill would call "a naughty little document."=

**Chp 10 Substitutions:**
(YELLOW LIGHT ASSIGNMENT: don't do this ahead of time!) ►Call to mind a recent argument you've had with a family member, a friend, a peer or even a stranger. ►On loose leaf paper, analyze the argument, using the criteria of JWT (1) Was this argument your **last resort**? What else could or did you try first? (2) Did you have a **just cause**? How was the **common good** at stake? (3) Was your **intention right**? Was the just cause/common good the **real reason** you argued, or was there some other reason? Did you just want to win an argument? (4) Were you the competent authority (**right person**) to have this argument? Was it your role to address the issue, or was it someone else’s job? (5) Are you **relatively just,** honestly trying to live a good moral life, and acting for the common good habitually? Have you **caused** this person to resent you in any way? (6) Did you have a **reasonable expectation of success** that the other person would listen to your argument? (7) Did the argument promise **proportionate benefits** which outweigh the harm of conflict? What positive change did you hope and expect to make? What good did you expect to come from the argument? ►**Justice within war (//jus in bello//): were you completely just //during// the argument?** (8) Did you use **proportionate means** or more force than necessary to succeed? Did you cause more harm than good? (9) Did you **discriminate non-combatants** from combatants? Did you have the argument with the right person? Did the argument hurt anyone else unnecessarily?
 * Personal Conflict and JWT **
 * ►Justice in going to war (//jus ad bellum//): should you have //had// the argument? **
 * ►(10) Final determination: was this a just argument? How could it have been more just?**

media type="youtube" key="d0nERTFo-Sk" width="560" height="315"
 * Economics: Hayek vs. Keynes **
 * ---No assignment. Just enjoy. And think.**
 * --And yes, there is a [|SEQUEL.]**

**Chp 10 Supplements:**


[|Judgment at Nuremberg: THE VERDICT] [|Reichskonkordat of 1933] (Wikipedia article) [|Mit Brennender Sorge] (Pope Pius XI's encyclical condemning Germany for violating the Concordat)

**Chp 10 Learning Outcomes:**
»To broaden our understanding of justice. »To ground our understanding of justice in the Gospel. »To trace the progression of PDE, Self defense, Capital Punishment, and Just War Theory. »To tolerate reasonable self defense but oppose unjust use of force. »To analyze case studies in self defense, including in Capital Punishment and in War. »To acknowledge the rights of workers and the dignity of human work. »To inspect the failure of western governments' efforts to curb AIDS in developing countries, and to discover the practicality and success of Catholic efforts. »To recognize the teaching of the Church, particularly the Theology of the Body, as humanity's best hope for justice.

**Chp 10 Test Format:**
(25 points) Matching 25-to-25 (25 points) (9 points) JWT case study (9 points). ** Match each point of evidence to the criterion it fulfills. ** Four short essays or bullet-point lists: -(10 points) List the criteria of the PDE -(10 points) Explain how the PDE leads to the PSD -(10 points) Explain how the PSD leads to theory of tolerating CapP -(10 points) Explain how the PSD leads to the JWT (16 points) Short but INTENSE essay about the importance of the definition of the Human Act. (10 points) Cumulative Review. Giving a few key words for each, state what the ten chapters and the whole year were about.
 * Part 1: Scantron**
 * Part 2: On Loose Leaf**
 * --Plan your answer in advance! In 3-5 sentences, tell me how HA is THE pivotal concept of the year. Show me the DEPTH of your understanding! **

media type="youtube" key="wVSmiasnAuk" height="390" width="480"